Name | Net raised | Net spent | Cash-on-hand |
---|---|---|---|
Tarryl Clark | $375,143 | $166,702 | $235,545 |
Rick Nolan | $65,649 | $33,617 | $32,032 |
Jeff Anderson | $51,020 | $30,409 | $20,611 |
Tarryl Clark is proving that her fundraising chops were not solely the product of being Michele Bachmann's opponent, she raised more than three times as much money as her two DFL rivals combined, Rick Nolan and Jeff Anderson, who need to do much better at bringing in the cash if they are going to seriously challenge Cravaack in November.
Based on the endorsement arms race that is currently unfolding between Nolan and Anderson the DFL party endorsement for the eighth district seems like it is out of Tarryl Clark's reach. And since Nolan and Anderson are in the process of seeking the endorsement, they might feel like they don't need to be fundraising in earnest quite yet.
This is the advantage that Tarryl Clark has over her opponents. Having just run for congress in 2010, she is well aware of the fundraising required to mount a congressional campaign and clearly has no qualms about asking for money.
Jeff Anderson has only run for the city council, and when Rick Nolan last ran for congress things were quite a bit different; a candidate didn't need to spend every waking hour on the phone asking people for money, these days they do.
So while it seems unlikely that Tarryl Clark is going to win the DFL endorsement in the eighth district, she is building a warchest for the inevitable primary fight that will ensue after the endorsement is handed out. And if she keeps fundraising at this rate, she will be a tough primary opponent.
For comparison, here's what the incumbent raised:
Name | Net raised | Net spent | Cash-on-hand | Debt |
---|---|---|---|---|
Chip Cravaack | $552,834 | $199,247 | $382,507 | $32,550 |
No comments:
Post a Comment